The compare page takes the three tools we’re most often weighed against head-on. This page is the longer read — all six job-application tools you’ll meet while shopping, with the honest read on each plus two names worth knowing not to use.
What we built because we did not see it elsewhere. Honest pitch: apply to more jobs, but make every one tailored.
Broadest ATS coverage of any tool. Free tier is genuinely useful. Trade-off: you still click every submit button.
Lifetime pricing. Trustpilot ~2.1/5 with majority one-star — the most-cited complaint is broken CAPTCHAs and applications that look submitted but never land.
500K+ company career pages, the broadest reach of any tool. Worth knowing: server-side automation puts the tool maker on the legal hook for platform ToS, not just the user.
Trustpilot ~4.5/5 — the best reviews in the category. Quality-focused, capped at ~40 apps/week, narrower platform list. If their cap fits you, they are excellent.
Strong on ATS autofill (Workday, Greenhouse, Lever). Auto-submit is gated behind a beta. Job database has reports of expired or fake postings — spot-check listings.
The same thirteen questions, asked of all six. Where we wrote “Unknown,” we couldn’t verify the answer from public docs and we won’t guess. If a vendor publishes their own answer we’ll update this table.
| Capability | TimeBaQ | Simplify | LazyApply | JobCopilot | Wobo | Jobright |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auto-submit (not just autofill) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Beta |
| Full ATS forms (not Easy Apply only) | Yes | Autofill only | Easy Apply | Yes | Yes | Autofill |
| CAPTCHA solving | Yes — 3 types | N/A | Often fails | Unknown | Unknown | N/A |
| Anti-detection drivers | Patchright + fallbacks | N/A | None | None | "Humanlike" | None |
| Per-job AI cover letters | Yes | Paid tier | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Voice-tuned cover letters | Yes (Power tier) | No | No | No | No | No |
| Reusable Q&A library | Local + AI cache | Browser | Basic | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Local-first storage | Yes | Extension | Extension | Cloud | Cloud | Cloud |
| Native desktop app | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Free tier worth using | 25 apps/mo | Yes (autofill) | No | No | No | Limited |
| Founder pricing locked for life | Yes (first 100/tier) | No | Lifetime | No | No | No |
| Workday auto-submit | Soon | Autofill only | No | Yes | No | Beta |
| Greenhouse / Lever auto-submit | Soon (Q3 2026) | Autofill only | No | Yes | No | No |
Sourced from each product’s public pricing & feature pages, last updated May 2026. Spot something stale? Tell us.
A comparison page with no honest losses is a marketing page. These are the three cases a competitor is the right answer for your search — written so you don’t pay us for the wrong tool and refund it next week.
Their free tier is the most generous autofill on the market, and we don’t support those ATS yet. We will.
Their 4.5/5 Trustpilot is genuinely earned. If volume isn’t your bottleneck, paying them more than us is fine.
We don’t auto-apply to Workday yet (multi-month problem — per-company accounts, email verifications, custom forms). If you’re applying mostly to Fortune 500s, look elsewhere for now.
Comparison posts elsewhere on the internet still list these two. One is closed; the other has the kind of charge-but-no-applications report you’d want to know about before paying. We’re not naming them to insult them — just so you know to look closely.
Closed in January 2025. If a comparison post still lists them, it’s out of date. Worth checking the date on any “top auto-apply tools 2026” piece you’re reading.
Multiple public reports of charged accounts that submitted zero applications, very low Scam Detector trust score. We aren’t naming this to insult them — just so you know to look closely before paying. Read recent reviews on more than one site.
If TimeBaQ’s the right answer, founder pricing is still open. If it isn’t, the page above tells you which is.